Answering the question “Which ‘Girls’ Girl are you?”
I have a ton to say about HBO series, Girls, the seeming T.V. underdog turned sensation. What is it about this show that has drawn the attention of so many people, even those that are outside of its apparent demographic. I’ve seen a lot of people talk about Girls, heard them talk about it, and I have always wanted to talk about it myself.
The first thing people ask you about Girls is if you like it. There is an extreme polarizing reaction to the show—dividing camps between people who love it and people who absolutely despise it. Rarely have people fallen on the exact, thin divisive line of “it’s okay,” and people who do say this often lean towards one reaction.
The second thing people ask other people about Girls is, “So which one are you?” That’s probably the hardest thing to answer accurately, because they are all awful and freely picking one to embody yourself is a hard and unattractive decision. They are awful, though, in the way that you get, in the way that you can maybe sympathize with. What I see when I see the Girls girls are the worst versions of ourselves, the parts that we try to hide or deny, amplifed and glaring on your T.V. screen for half an hour each week.
We get to know the self-absorbed best friends and roommates: shrill, uptight Marnie and perennially unemployed Hannah (played by Lena Dunham, the twenty-six-year-old female creator of the show—but that’s another story) who recurring character, Elijah, said that were cut from the same selfish cloth. Marnie is fickle and juvenile, though she likes to think of herself as grown up. Hannah seems to have very little self-worth, and likes to pretend she knows what she’s doing when what she really is is lost.
There’s well-traveled, liberated, reformed wild child Jessa who gets by as a good looking nanny with very little to lose. Then, there’s Jessa’s cousin: sheltered, inexperienced Shoshanna, who dubbed her virgin self a Samantha Jones. (Shoshanna is actually not that mean. She is very, very endearing, and I think I would want to be her the most.) These people seem to be oblivious to their own flaws, which is what I find a little hard to believe. But, people do have their own blind spots; it’s just so hard for me to believe that theirs can be as glaring and obvious as they are.
There’s very little that’s aspirational about the Girls characters, but I think that’s why I like them so much. A lot of people have been put off by this plain Jane, awkward version of the New Yorkian stories that HBO seems to make every once in a while, but I like it because it makes you uncomfortable in a way that’s not horrific, but just earnest and real—shame and secrets shoved right up there in your face.
I love it because it gets to the meat of things, even though the truth is often awkward and strange and horrible, instead of beating around the bush for oh, I don’t know, seven seasons. Do I like the “ugly people sex”? Of course not, but it’s a part of the show and it works because it exposes everything, much like how every ugly thing about these people are exposed, too.
Another thing that I really like about Girls, as a show, is that they make no excuses for the awfulness of their characters. It really doesn’t care if you end up liking them or hating them for what they do. What happens is that you develop some empathy or compassion for some of them, because you’ve been there, too. Maybe not in exactly the same situations, but maybe steeped in the same feelings. I find that, as we see more episodes of Girls, their characters enough space and enough layers to be believable as people.
I saw episode 7, “Welcome to Bushwick a.ka. The Crackcident,” last night. I have never been to a warehouse party in Bushwick, but I roared with laughter and I felt for them. Maybe because I’ve done things that I’m not proud of. Maybe also because I have felt as betrayed, as wounded, as discarded, and as embarrassed as they have. Not in the same exact way—I have never faceplanted the pavement falling off the front wheel of a bicycle—but in a way that’s enough.
Plus, it was way funny.
Girls is more than just “Sex and the City for ugly people,” and it’s hardly the voice of our generation. What it is is a damn good show where we see lost twenty-somethings, in their complexity and depth, unafraid to show the ugly, broken bits that a lot of us would love to hide instead. It’s too early to tell what kind of people they are, but each week, another layer is uncovered. Right now, it’s about horrible people-in a real sense, not in a Joffrey Baratheon sense–that you end up rooting for because, sometimes, you can actually see them (secretly) as you.

NOTHING SPACES
© Carina Santos 2009-2012. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress. Modified Hiperminimalist. (Colophon?)
SUBSCRIBE:
Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)
ELSEWHERE:
Maybe Very Happy
Pelikula
Recovery
Log in















This is absolutely wonderful, Carina. <3
Thanks, Tin! :)
GIRLS – 1, HATERS – 0
Yay, Don points for the Girls team!
The unabashed, unapologetic portrayal of awkward sex is cringe-worthy. I’m completely hooked on this show.
High five! Idk, doesn’t seem “complete” without it.
I love this show so much. I didn’t like it at first thinking it’s just a show of some daughters of some famous people but glad i gave it a try. I still have a love and hate relationship with Lena’s character and unfortunately find myself more like her than anybody else, specially how she clings to Adam, the fucking loser you can’t live without… I’d want to be Jessa the character on TV and her as Jemima in real life, she’s a very good artist and a lovely mom, plus I find her accent not annoying which is uncommon. I love Sho, she’s so freaking cool, loved her so much specially during the crackcident. And Marnie, oh Marnie, she’s really pretty, she reminds me of me sometimes, a stuck up… reminds me of my old bestfriend..
i love how it tackles real life issues … like how modern family is
LOL honestly, I find the nepotism thing so irrelevant because over the past episodes, you know that at least most of them can hold their own.
Ah, I want to look up Jemima Kirke now! I love Shoshanna talaga; I’m so glad she has been getting more screentime. Ugh, I can’t stand Marnie. I am sad that I feel like, at least in terms of attitude, she’s the one I’m most like.
I love Girls, and I love the way you put it, how it makes you uncomfortable in a way that old memories tend to make you uncomfortable, so it clings to that same sense of warmth and fuzziness that you get when going back to times when you should have known better but you didn’t because duh, how could’ve you?
I know I’m a lot like Hannah because she’s the one person I don’t actually want to be like. I mean, say what you will, but Jessa’s British and has a Brigitte Bardot face and Rihanna’s ass plus that youthful and reckless abandon–absolute presence.
So yeah, since the latest episode, I’m really excited to see where the characters are going! :))
Yep, that’s exactly what I was thinking. We all have our own personal blind spots. My friend was saying she felt just like Hannah, and I told her she was wrong, because she’s the LEAST selfish person I know. But she said she saw herself in how much she gave to Adam, despite his awful treatment of her.
I’m excited too :)
I love this show. And I agree that one of the best things about it is how openly awful the characters are. (It’s great that the main character is not particularly likeable!)
To me, Marnie is the least likeable – though, it was easier watching her in the most recent episode. She just seemed more endearing/human/tolerable when she was miserable. :)
I love this one “Inside the Episode” feature, especially the part where Lena Dunham says, “A big part of the show is Hannah thinking that the world is going to see her own value. I also think that she has that kind of interesting mix of complete self-confidence and no self-worth …”
Just thought I’d share: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wbor0J5Kcg